25TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION

25TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION

 

In 1988, as part of a youth club community project, Vic Reed the youth club leader, encouraged local young people to take on the role of publishers, printers and distributors of a “What’s On” publication; a previous single sheet of information had originally been produced by a, short lived, local group of Venture Scouts.

Vic constructed a printing room within the Wheelright Shop, adjacent to the Church Hall. Using stencils and Rono printing machines, along with plenty of black ink, a small monthly magazine appeared for the next five years until Vic moved from the village.

A small team consisting of Eileen Callely, Marilyn Case, Colin Jenkins, Ann Miller and Ian Moody agreed to continue publishing a village magazine. They changed the design to an A4 format and had the journal printed professionally. The first 400 copies rolled off the presses and were distributed in October 1993. Now a quarter of a century later with a ‘New Team’, plus one old stager, we are printing over 700 copies of our 25th Christmas edition.

It is thanks to all of you out there who supply the many various interesting items of text each month, and our 39 dedicated distributors, that the magazine has survived these many years to arrive on your doorstep at the start of each month.

 

‘The Team’ (see below) wish you all a Merry Christmas and a very article productive New Year.

 

 

 



 

OXFAM PENARTH VINYL STOCK HITS ROCK BOTTOM!

 

OXFAM PENARTH VINYL STOCK HITS ROCK BOTTOM!

The Oxfam Shop in Penarth continues to receive an amazing response to the vinyl records it has for sale in its shop. We now have a good number of regular customers who come in to the shop looking for records to add to their collection. The down side to this is that we regularly run out of stock to price up and put on display! Are you having a clear out before Christmas and have some vinyl records you no longer play or want? If so, we would love you to think of donating them to the Oxfam shop in Penarth. We are interested in records of any genre whether they be LP's EP's or singles. We guarantee to get the best possible prices for any records you donate. As I live in Wenvoe I can pick up any of your donations. We would also be delighted to accept CD's, cassettes/tapes, DVD's, sheet music, music books and old musical instruments whether working or not. You can either ring the shop to arrange a pick up or direct with myself. Thank you. Oxfam Shop Penarth: 02920 706358 or Nigel Billingham Oxfam Music Volunteer 02920 594708

 

 



 

Change

If you’re unaware as to who Brett Kavanaugh is, I’m sure you’ve not glanced at the news recently. The Supreme Court nominee, accused of attempted sexual assault, who despite the odds, became a Supreme Court Justice and proved that in America, when a woman accuses a man of sexual misconduct, she is the liar. A pattern we have unfortunately seen repeated time and time again.

Dr Christine Blasey Ford had received “actual threats to her safety and her life” before appearing in front of the Senate judiciary committee to testify against the then-nominee Kavanaugh. Despite numerous witnesses to the attempted assault, including a high school friend of Kavanaugh’s who is alleged to have been present in the room during the attempted assault, Ford’s accusation was dismissed as being ‘politically charged’ by many. But the theme of dismissing sexual assault claims as ‘lies’ or ‘opportunistic’ isn’t new, and neither is it uncommon. The world has a problem believing a claim of sexual misconduct, and I don’t know why. According to a 2015 report by the National Sexual Violence Resource Centre, the prevalence of false reporting sexual violence in the United States is only between 2% and 10%. Considering that the report also states, “a study of eight U.S. communities, which included 2,059 cases of sexual assault, found a 7.1% rate of false reports” why can’t we believe the people who are brave enough to come forward to speak about their trauma?

Three women including Ford came forward to accuse Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct. There is no excuse of ‘it was a mistake he made once’ (an incredibly weak excuse at that – rape is rape, attempted rape is no different; that’s not a mistake, that’s a choice to violate someone) Kavanaugh had a pattern of violating women. And still, the highest court in America took his side.

In 2017, Brett Kavanaugh was on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals and ruled against a 17-year-old undocumented teenager who was attempting to obtain an abortion. Jane Doe, who did not want her identity revealed throughout the case, arrived in the

United States without her parents and was taken into the U.S. Custody. She was pregnant and was aiming to exercise her constitutional right to obtain a legal abortion; this right extends not only to United States citizens, but also foreigners within the US. Kavanaugh had delayed her ability to obtain a legal abortion and claimed that the government should not facilitate her abortion, but at 15 weeks pregnant, her window was closing. Kavanaugh stated “she is pregnant and has to make a major life decision”, but his action in ruling against her plea seems to claim that he believed having an abortion was more life altering than having a child which would have been unwanted, and a child Jane Doe would have been unable to financially support. Jane Doe eventually obtained the right to legally obtain an abortion within the United States, but it was she who gained much of the backlash for the decision, not those who voted against her. A tweet by Teen Vogue columnist, Lauren Duca stated “It seems to me that when Brett Kavanaugh attempted to deny a 17-year-old immigrant an abortion, he believed that the decisions you make as a minor ought to have lifelong consequences. Let’s treat him the same way”.

Let's treat him the same way. The old 'boys will be boys' line is dated and inexcusable. Kavanaugh's actions in the attempted sexual assault when he was a teenager doesn't mean he can't still be held accountable for his actions now. Jane Doe will be seen as the immigrant who got rid of her baby, and yet Brett Kavanaugh's attempted sexual assault and the many claims which have also come to light have been dismissed and he now holds a position of power high enough to be influential in cases such as his in the future. And you know which way he'll vote then. America's poor judgement seems sewn into its history; a man who was accused of rape is now their President, their history of gun violence is unchanged and they are breaking their own record year after year with the worst mass shootings in American history. It's shocking that a man like Kavanaugh could go through such a heavily-followed case which included numerous allegations of sexual misconduct and still be awarded with one of the highest seats at the table. It's shocking. But it's not surprising.

From the Harvey Weinstein story of last year, to the MeToo campaign, to the Kavanaugh case, the world has proven that barely anyone believes those who have accused others of sexual misconduct. We typically believe the accused, and I’m sick of it.

I believe her. I believe him. I believe those who have come forward with their stories. Sexual misconduct is a matter which shouldn’t be taken lightly. But it’s a topic where we have consistently let down those who must fight to even be heard. Please let it stop.

By Tirion Davies

The Fall of Singapore

The following article is by Frank Miller who was in the Royal Artillery. He was in Singapore from 1941 until 1945 and became a prisoner of war for three and a half year. Frank lives in Grange Close.

Singapore 8th Dec 1941 to 15 Feb 1942

The fall of Singapore was a military disaster brought about by pacifist attitudes in this country pre-1939 in spite of Germany’s extensive rearmament programme, quietly during the 1920s and blatantly throughout the 1930s after Hitler’s rise to power. In contrast, expenditure on the military in the UK had been at a reduced level for some time when the crisis of 1938, which brought us to the brink of war with Germany, showed our defence capability to be in an appalling state. It wasn’t until 12 months later that war was declared on Germany, even though we were not fully prepared for hostilities.

Singapore at that time was a colonial outpost of Britain, and was wealthy from exporting rubber and tin and, up until 1939, secure in its peaceful setting. This changed with the fall of France in 1940 because ‘French Indo China’, (now known as Vietnam) which was France’s colony on the opposite side of the Gulf of Siam to Malaysia, became a German possession. This enabled Japan, an axis partner of Germany and an emerging military power in the Pacific through their war with China, to occupy it and thus become a threat to Malaya and Singapore as well as the Asian countries and including Australia.

Because of growing Japanese military power in the Pacific and incursions into China in the late 1920s to early 1930s, it became clear that there was a very real possibility that a future threat to Singapore could occur. A base was built on the island for the navy with airfields constructed along the West coast of Malaya. These acted as land based aircraft carriers to give cover for any naval action in the vicinity of the coast but no up to-date ships or aircraft with crews were stationed there. Air defence for the island relied on Brewster Buffaloes as fighters and a mixed assortment of other aircraft, including a squadron of vintage Vildabeest bombers which were bi-planes. These were unfortunately all lost in one daylight action which showed that the Royal Air Force (Singapore) were no match for the Japanese equivalent, who very quickly established air superiority. This caused panic in the newly constructed airfields which led to them being abandoned in haste, thereby endangering the newly built battle ship ‘HMS Prince of Wales’ and cruiser ‘HMS Repulse’. Both of these had arrived a week or so earlier in a blaze of media publicity, alerting the Japanese who arranged their sinking shortly after the war started by sending Torpedo bombers from their Airforce.

To make matters worse Air Chief Marshal Brooke Popham, senior officer in charge of Malaya and Singapore defences, failed his brief in dealing with the hostile landings of the Japanese military forces,

firstly by dithering and then by moving the army from their prepared position to meet the threat too late. This caused them to be caught between two enemy landings in Northern Malaya bordering Thailand, making their extraction very difficult. With no prepared fall-back position, or any defence constructed, the steel tank straps delivered earlier lay at the side of the road unused and the road to Singapore was wide open which led to Brook Popham being sacked with immediate effect. The Indian Army Division, through unrest in India against British rule and infiltration by Japanese propaganda, became unreliable resulting in many desertions, of whole companies in some cases, to the Japanese side though Gurkha troops remained staunchly loyal. This caused many withdrawals in the battle line to repair the breaches in the front line.

Japanese power in the Pacific, with their war against China, became a possible threat to stability in the area which the Government in London took seriously. However, the Singapore Government, under Sir Shelton Thomas, and colonials were more than complacent and looked upon the newly arriving military reinforcements as unnecessary. The regular troops in residence were used to help contain any local unrest and ceremonial functions. They were not willing to accept any intelligence on Japanese intentions which conflicted with their own interpretation, being of white man supremacy and the Japanese of native intellect. Their complacency turned to terror with the bombing of Penang Island. The colonials commandeered all the available transport to evacuate themselves and their families with as many possessions as they could save, leaving the local population to endure the mass blanket bombing that the Japanese subjected the Island to which resulted in tremendous loss of life. With the army bereft of any naval or air support they were desperate to find a suitable defence position but were finding this very difficult as they were under constant air attack. To exacerbate matters, the Japanese army, who travelled light on bicycles, were using captured supplies to facilitate their advance and were hot on the heels of the British as they withdrew. They managed to infiltrate their front line and set up a road block, cutting off a large section of the British force and, in spite of spirited action by the British, this proved impossible to break. As their supplies dwindled, further action was ruled out and in order to escape surrender it was decided to leave the very severely wounded to their fate and the fit and walking wounded were to make their way through the thick jungle,with considerable difficulty, to the West coast of Malaya from where they were eventually rescued and taken to Singapore. Up until that time the Australian contingent were guarding the East coastal flank behind the British line in order to prevent any more enemy landings. At the behest of General Wavel, Supreme Commander S.E. Asia, they took up battle stations in the front line leaving the East coast unguarded. Though they did magnificently in forcing the Japanese to retreat,

they were unable to hold their gains through losses in action. With no reinforcements available and pressure from Japanese attacks they had to retire, leaving their wounded who were treated very badly. In the event, the lack of defences, enemy landings in their rear, lack of air cover and being under constant air bombardment, the Malay mainland had to be abandoned to concentrate the armed forces in defending Singapore. To coin a phrase, too little too late. In the closing stages a convoy bearing half of the eighteen division, who were infantry, arrived in the Island, though lacking most of their stores which had been lost through enemy action. They had no time to acclimatise, disembarking and being thrown straight into action. They borrowed what weaponry they could from the Australians and that they did well is to their credit. It was, however, the lack of aerial support which had been promised and did not materialise, plus the the massacre of medical staff and patients at Princess Alexander Hospital, that put a strain on morale. Though front line units of the British Army remained loyal, there was some panic and desertions in the back areas and these were not confined to the lower ranks. The Australian Army staged a walk out of the front line in protest of lack of aerial support and there were some problems with troops trying to board a ship specially reserved to evacuate women and children.

After a fortnight’s fire fight the Japanese captured the Island’s water supply making surrender inevitable and occurring on Sunday 15 February 1942. The Japanese were notorious in their treatment of captured prisoners but agreed to accept prisoners under surrender terms however it did not mean they intended to keep them alive as future events proved. As far as the captured forced were concerned they were looking at an uncertain future, beginning with being concentrated in Changi Barracks and having to wait several days before any food was issued.

[We hope Frank will provide additional articles in future on his time spent in Singapore]

WENVOE REMEMBERS

WENVOE REMEMBERS

100 YEARS SINCE THE GUNS FELL SILENT

The Wenvoe War Memorial lists 74 men who took part in the Great War (1914-1918). 12 died and 62 returned to the village. The memorial was designed by William Clarke who was a resident in Wenvoe. The carboniferous limestone used was extracted from the Alps Quarry. Construction was complete by mid November 1919 at a cost of £289:11:4. The names of those killed in World War II were added later.

 

 

 

 

 

What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?

Only the monstrous anger of the guns.

Only the stuttering rifles' rapid rattle

Can patter out their hasty orisons.

No mockeries now for them; no prayers nor bells;

Nor any voice of mourning save the choirs,

The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells;

And bugles calling for them from sad shires.

What candles may be held to speed them all?

Not in the hands of boys, but in their eyes

Shall shine the holy glimmers of good-byes.

The pallor of girls' brows shall be their pall;

Their flowers the tenderness of patient minds,

And each slow dusk a drawing-down of blinds.

Wilfrid Owen

 

 



 

1 30 31 32